TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) Causes Cancer in Satanic Abortion-Loving Leftists

Posted on by thechristiantechnerd

I don’t even know how to say this gently, so I’m just going to be honest.

Something is seriously wrong with the way people are acting. People are cool with blurting out loud that they want the president to be “taken out”.

The Left is EVIL. The LEFT is SATANIC!

As a 25-year-old woman who loves God, I believe in truth, in self-control, in guarding your heart—and what I’m seeing right now doesn’t reflect any of that. The way people obsess over Donald Trump, the constant outrage, the anger that never seems to turn off… it’s not normal. And it’s definitely not healthy.

People call it Trump Derangement Syndrome, or TDS.



It’s not a medical diagnosis—it’s a term people use to describe this overwhelming, almost consuming hatred and fixation. And whether you like that term or not, you can’t deny the behavior is real.

Now let me be clear, because truth matters: there is no scientific evidence that TDS causes cancer, but more and more leftist are becoming so mentally unwell, that they will probably get brain cancer.

But what is real? The damage that constant anger, stress, and obsession can do to your body and your spirit.

And that’s where I get frustrated.

Because we’re walking around acting like it’s normal to live in a state of nonstop outrage. It’s not. God didn’t create us to be consumed by anger 24/7. When your mind is constantly focused on negativity—when everything you watch, read, and talk about is fueled by frustration—it affects you. Your peace disappears. Your thoughts get clouded. Your energy changes.

And honestly? It shows.

The Bible talks about guarding your heart for a reason. What you allow to take root in your mind will grow—whether it’s peace or chaos. And right now, a lot of people are choosing chaos.

I’m not saying you can’t have opinions. I’m not saying you have to agree with anyone. But when it turns into obsession—when it controls your mood, your conversations, even your identity—that’s not strength. That’s loss of control.

And I’m tired of pretending it’s not.

We need to do better. Not just politically, but spiritually and mentally. Step back. Turn off the noise. Spend time with God instead of feeding the same cycle of anger over and over again.

Because no person—no matter who they are—is worth losing your peace over.

Not now. Not ever.

So the next time you see a democrat, say a prayer for them because they’re not very bright, and they may actually end up coming down with TDS Cancer of the brain.

Unknown's avatar

Published by thechristiantechnerd

22 year old college student! 100% Christian,! Will ALWAYS be a woman of FAITH. And my friends call me the "The Christian Tech Nerd" because I was hired by a very successful tech company in Silicon Valley, and I turned them down to be close to my family!

57 thoughts on “TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) Causes Cancer in Satanic Abortion-Loving Leftists”

  1. Well written post, but everyone that is a democrat is not a satanic abortion loving leftist, very inappropriate to use brain cancer as a metaphor or anything.

    Everyone that disagrees don’t have TDS, some people just disagrees.

    There are extremist on both sides, that’s why I hate politics.

    The person who shot at that dinner deserve what punishment he gets.

    I disagree with some of your post but always read them, they are always well written. You are a gifted writer.

    Keep Being You, hopefully with more compassion and understanding, but you are very young, very mature for your age but young.

    Just my opinion

    Like

    Reply

  2. Die zeigst dein Gesicht wie es Gott schuf und bearbeitest deine Fotos nicht nach. Das ist wahrhaft christlich und ohne jede Eitelkeit, die eine der sieben Hauptsünden in der christlichen Tradition darstellt. So bist du ein authentischer Mensch, der sich so darstellt, wie er ist. Oder sehe ich das falsch?

    Like

    Reply

  3. I worked for a conservative Republican legislator. I have been an evangelical Christian since I was young.Your blog has become appalling.  It is clear that your politics are as, or more, important than you spiritual beliefs.  Even if you assume you are right,  you turn off so many people from hearing any spiritual (and eternal) message you have because the first thing they hear (like seeing your headline before reading any words you say) is your politics. You support a person who, if someone is actually willfully blind enough to believe he is not a pedophile, at a minimum protects pedophile.  That is hardly Christian. DJT is immoral in every way. He proclaims proudly that “I have never done anything that I have had to ask forgiveness for”.  Most recently, he posted an image of himself as Jesus–the very definition of blasphemy!  So even if you overlook his felony convictions, his guilty verdicts for sexual assault, his efforts to hide the Epstein files and his association…Biblically, theologically, he is not only wrong but blasphemous!  To not only overlook that, but to openly and vehemently support that is in direct contradiction to Scripture.  You should look in the mirror and realize you are a cultist. I have not been able to unsubscribe.  Please assist me by taking me off your propaganda distribution. Thank you.

    Like

    Reply

  4. Don’t ever mistake me for a Bible expert, but your article reminds me of the scene in the Book of Exodus when Moses comes down with the 12 Commandants only to find his followers worshipping a golden calf. Such a clear teaching of fallen humanity.

    Like

    Reply

  5. It’s not nice to stereotype people. Do you read your posts before publishing. You said, “The next time you see a Democrat, pray for them, because they’re not very bright.” You just insulted.me, and you don’t even know me. I guess the prayers should start with. I’m a Democrat.

    You once said that you write from the heart. If this is coming from your heart, you should pray for a new heart. Your words create strife and it’s not becoming for a Christian who loves God to speak that way. Ask yourself, “Would Jesus speak that way?” It seems you have a problem with people who identify as Democrats. I disagree with you, but I don’t hate you.

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  6. I agree, it is very concerning. But the world has gone through this much and so much more in the past and I’m a big believer that although things look negative now, we just need to keep looking for the positive because if we do we’ll find that it outweighs the negative by a mile! Thank you!

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  9. Well, you should say that. I disagree with abortions too. But I don’t hate Dems because of it. Whether you believe it or not, there will be lots of Dems in heaven.
    Abortion is not the only sin.

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply

  10. I understand how you feel. I want you t think about this: If someone has cancer, we wouldn’t hate the person. We would hate the cancer in the person. So it is with abortion. Let’s not hate the person, but rather the spirit of ignorance and selfishness behind the abortion. Let us love one another, correcting each other with compassion and understanding. By this, the world will know that we are disciples od.Christ.

    Although we have different opinions, remember that we are brothers and sisters in Christ, not political enemies.
    Again, I admire your fire for your beliefs. God bless you Christian Nerd.

    Like

    Reply

  11. You knowChristian Tech BNerd you spoke the truth abortion is murderb ignore Eric Bunbar. Youre not being a steroytpe do younot tremeber what thebible says uselss arguments. Yourpreaching amd sharing what the Lord Almighty put on your heart to share. You told the ruth I dont even support the demorcrats I dontagree with the ruplicans either. The love of God doesnt mean we accept evil we speak against it in truth

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  12. I recommend reading the Noble Eightfold Path, or indeed the sermon on the mount should you prefer Christianity over Buddhism. Spiritual traditions today emphasise peace and decency. The New Testament is precisely that – a new way of thinking and acting. Even if you are an atheist like I am, such systems of thought are profoundly beautiful. War and violence can never lead to peace. Triumphal Arches and ballrooms such as would have made Nero or Caligula bubble with joy represent money which could be better spent on the sick, the poor and the homeless. Making America great is indeed possible – by adopting decency, humanity, kindness and honesty.

    Like

    Reply

  14. I agree, mostly. The phrase 86 47 is being over-interpreted. To be 86’d is old slang for being asked to leave a bar and not come back. It doesn’t mean to kill. Saying 8647 is a way of saying you wish DJT would leave. You are not wishing him dead.

    Jesus teaches us not to judge, but he also went after the money changers. Many of us do not think DJT’s actions are at all Christian. Hegseth’s either. Is it derangement syndrome? That is more a trop of the MAGA right that real.

    Like

    Reply

  16. I can’t criticise your prayers. Some of mine are biting. I sympathize. I’ve always been a pro-lifer. Watching (quite helplessly) my wife go through miscarriages during our trying phase made me reevaluate my position and hold it more deeply.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  19. I have voted both for republican and democratic candidates for all public offices. Calling people names like “satanic abortion-loving leftists” isn’t productive or Christ like. I do appreciate your post where you talk about guarding the heart and protecting our peace. Our focus should be on God’s kingdom and ways. God loves all people, even the ones we don’t. Love will conquer

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

  20. Putting the current Iran war into context … Iran’s war today – not an isolated eruption; but the latest phase of a century‑long struggle over Jewish sovereignty in the Middle East. Zionism, not a romantic project; but rather a response to existential threat repeatedly exposed by church and mosque inherited racial criminal insanity. The UN today continues this tradition where external powers have long repeatedly attempted to engineer the demographic and political fate of Jews. Iran adopts and amplifies this narrative, positioning itself as the champion of “resistance” to Zionism. Tehran’s ideology fuses Shi’a revolutionary theology with the older Arab rejectionist line: Israel is a colonial imposition that must be undone. After the fall of Nasserism and the decline of pan‑Arabism, the Islamic Republic of Iran positioned itself as the central patron of anti‑Israel forces.

    Theodor Herzl wrote in “Der Judenstaat”: “The Jewish question is a national question, and to solve it we must establish a home for the Jewish people.” … Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination in our own country. To do this Jews must partner with a great power who likewise endorse a Jewish state…”We shall need the patronage of a great power; and if we can secure that, we can realize our purpose. We must therefore appeal to the great powers of the world, and we must address ourselves to the Jewish question in these terms.”

    The White Paper explicitly framed its goal as preventing Palestine from becoming a Jewish state and ensuring an Arab majority in any independent Palestine that would emerge post war. Its deliberate restrictions on Jewish immigration to mandate Palestine, based upon the European racism which directly and indirectly contributed to the slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry proves Herzl’s estimation of Europe’s racial insanity toward Jews. The Iran–Israel war, to state it plainly: not new. Rather, simply the modern extension of the same struggle over Jewish self‑determination that Herzl identified in the 1890s and that the region has fought over ever since.

    Chamberlain’s White Paper serves as the basis for the European attempt to declare and validate a Palestinian state today; the White Paper explicitly stated this goal: “the establishment within 10 years of an independent Palestine State”. London favored the establishment of an Arab majority, which would rule Palestine; Chamberlain repeated the Czech betrayal, and limited Jewish immigration capped at 75,000 over five years (April 1939–April 1944) and further immigration requiring Arab consent.

    The White Paper’s restrictions deliberately imposed – at the moment when Nazi Germany and fascist Europe were carrying out the systematic murder of approximately six million Jews (75 % of Western European Jewry). The paper was issued while the Shoah – already under way, and while Britain itself – still neutral in the European war against the Jews. Its framers chose to freeze Jewish immigration at a level that would prevent the Jewish population from ever reaching majority status in a future independent Palestine.

    The policy was rooted in the same 19th–20th-century European political and demographic anxieties that had already produced racial antisemitism (the “Jewish Question” as a perceived racial/cultural threat). The White Paper’s language of “absorptive capacity,” “economic conditions,” and constitutional guarantees of Arab majority rule echoed the same underlying worldview that had justified pogroms, expulsions, and later the Nuremberg Laws. It was not a sudden invention of the 1930s; it was the logical culmination of the Mandate’s earlier pro-immigration framework having produced the very demographic shift the White Paper now blocked. Herzl’s entire project rested on the recognition that European societies were racially and culturally “insane” toward Jews; Zionism represents his prescription for a rational exit from that European-Shoah-guilt insanity.

    The post ’48 Nakba narrative, not a neutral “national trauma story”. Nakba bemoaned the Arab failed war of annihilation to destroy the Jewish community in the territory of the defunct British mandate. The term “Palestine” reintroduced consequent to the ‘Sick Man of Europe’s’ economic bankruptcy, did Sultans hire cheaper French cartographers in the 18th Century; that European ‘great power’ reintroduced Palestine upon Ottoman maps of the Middle East. Prior to that time no Ottoman map listed “Greater Syria” as Palestine nor Istanbul as Constantinople.

    After the Battle of Yarmouk (636 CE) Arab forces defeated the Byzantine field army and took control of much of the Levant. The territory became part of the rapidly expanding Rashidun (and later Umayyad) Caliphate and administered as the Jund Dimashq, Jund Filastin, Jund al-Urdunn; “wilāya/walayāt” (provinces), a separate term used in different periods. Jund al-Urdunn: first instituted under the Rashidun Caliphate (reorganization under Caliph ʿUmar, c. 639). Jund Filastin: organized soon after the Muslim conquest in the 630s — established during the Rashidun period and continued under the Umayyads. Jund Dimashq: likewise created during the early (Rashidun) reorganizations after the conquest and continued under the Umayyad administration. Modern scholarly syntheses conclude the ajnad framework – established by the Rashidun reorganization (traditionally attributed to ʿUmar c. 18 AH / 639 CE) and consolidated under the Umayyads. Modern scholarly syntheses conclude the ajnad framework – established by the Rashidun reorganization and consolidated under the Umayyads.

    Throughout the years of the British colonial-mandate, Arabs fundamentally rejected the Balfour Declaration to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine. The post ’48 Nakba narrative, not a neutral “national trauma story”. Nakba bemoaned the Arab failed war of annihilation to destroy the Jewish community in the territory of the defunct British colonial-mandate. No great power Ottoman map listed “Greater Syria” as Palestine nor Istanbul as Constantinople.

    Throughout the years of the British mandate, Arabs fundamentally rejected the Balfour Declaration to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine. Nakba – not “we lost our homes” but “we lost the war which we launched to prevent Jewish self-determination in Palestine. Nakba not free-floating “national trauma” as UNWRA propaganda depicts.

    Historically there exists a regional concept of Filastin in early Islamic and later periods. But never sovereign Arab “Palestinian nation-state” as UN propaganda votes which condemn Israeli violations of “international law” harp and sing as if the UN exists as a heavenly voice. European cartography re‑standardized “Palestine” as a territorial label, which later became the basis for post ’67 UN fart: which bemoans the crimes of Israeli “occupied territories”. While its Resolution 3379 ignores the PLO Charter of ’64 which denounces only ’48 Israel as “occupied territories”.

    Herzl stated that the Jewish question – fundamentally a national one. He advocated for a homeland, based upon the inherited European racism; that only through Jewish self-determination can Jew overcome racial inherited European hatred.

    He emphasized that achieving this goal requires the support of a great power. The term “Palestine” – reintroduced on Ottoman maps due to changes in regional governance and economic Ottoman bankruptcy, Ben Gurion rejected when he named the new nation Israel. Prior to WWI, the region – commonly referred to in the context of “Greater Syria” without the designation of “Palestine.” This change reflects the evolving geopolitical landscape of this region.

    Throughout the British Mandate period, Arab opposition to the Balfour Declaration highlighted a rejection of the notion of a Jewish homeland, arguing that their struggle emphatically fought against Jewish self-determination. Therefore the term Nakba – not simply characterized through the UN propaganda distortion as – simply as a loss of homes. Rather, the fallout consequences of a failed war; specifically aimed at preventing Jewish self-determination. These facts fundamentally reject UN attempts to inject revisionist history which fundamentally denies the right of Israel as a nation state to determine its own international borders with other Arab states, specifically with Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.

    European permanent Security Council members repeatedly publicly declare: “That Israel has the right to self defense”. But they equally declare that the UN has the right to declare a “Palestinian State”; which they demand come from East Jerusalem, Samaria, and Gaza. Neither the Security Council members nor the General Assembly states possess the might of “international law” – despite their obtuse propaganda otherwise – to determine the borders of the Jewish State nor create the borders of a Palestinian state. Wars throughout history, Poland for example, shape and determine the borders of nation-states.

    Consequent to the Bar Kochba Revolt (132-136 CE) the Romans forcibly expelled Jews from Judea and renamed the conquered territory Palaestina, a term derived from “Philistine” – to permanently destroy the Jewish nation state of Judea; which achieved national Independence celebrated and remembered through the mitzva of lighting the Hanukkah lights. The consequence of this Jewish defeat – Jews endured a stateless refugee status till post Shoah! Today Arab refugees who fled from Judea, and Arab refugee populations captured by the IDF post ’67, no different from post Bar Kochba Jews.

    UN resolutions simply political, not some pie in the sky divine law decreed from Mt. Olympus. No GA vote or SC statement has the inherent power to fix Israel’s borders or magically conjure a Palestinian state. Attempts to do so, they directly compare to UN GA Resolution 3379 or UN SC Resolution 2334. UN moral theater does not determine the international borders of the Jewish State of Israel. The UN did not “create” Israel. Israel like the American Revolution won its national Independence against colonial British imperialism and French pre-’67 perfidy – through war. Attempts by the UN to recognize a “Palestinian State” simply the hallow echo chamber of Rome renaming Judea Palaestina.

    Herzl’s answer to the Jewish question—a sovereign Jewish state backed by great‑power recognition—remains a legitimate national solution. Arab rejection of that solution, the 1948 war, the Nakba narrative, and all of subsequent UN/European condemnations which denounce Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine. Such stinking backside noise directly smells like long, sophisticated UN attempt to undo Herzl’s solution; to re‑cast a war against Jewish self‑determination as pure victimhood, to retro‑invent a sovereign “Palestine” that never existed, and to deny Israel the same right every other nation has had—to let history, war, and nation-states treaty agreements determine its borders. Not by external powers repeating Rome’s old trick with new legal language, and pretending that Palestine as a UN Protectorate territory ceased to exist in 1948 – which categorizes the backside stench made by both the ICJ and the ICC.

    Zionism a response to pogroms, exclusion, and the collapse of Jewish emancipation in Europe; a legitimate national movement grounded in Herzl’s analysis of Jewish self‑determination and inherited Goyim racism. “Palestine” as a sovereign Arab nation-state never existed. European cartographers standardized the term “Palestine” in the 18th-19th centuries which reflected European great power interests which later carved up the Ottoman empire between England and France. Despite Arab sources Filastin, never a sovereign Palestinian state ever in Arab and Muslim history. The Nakba narrative today stands as a politically constructed propaganda; no UN resolutions can dictate Israel’s borders or undo the outcome of any Israeli war victory – fought since the Independence war.

    During colonial British mandate the 1936–39 Arab Revolt fought explicitly against the establishment of any Zionist-entity in colonial British Palestine. The popular Arab propaganda of Nakba today – simply propaganda lies – it fails to acknowledge the some 850,000 Jewish refugees forcibly expelled from all Arab countries after the Arab Nakba defeat in 1948. This UN propaganda which routinely catagorically slanders 3379 Israel – pretends that Chapter VI recommendations = to Chapter VII ultimatums like issued to North Korea.

    The Israeli 1949 Armistice lines shaped by war, not by UN fiat. The push for a Palestinian state is political, not legal. The propaganda which condemns Israel breaking “international law” simple a fart and nothing more. The UN aint the Pope. Post Shoah the UN failed to try Pius XII for war crimes which include the post war rat-lines and pogroms in Catholic Poland. Furthermore the church criminal slanders which culminated in the Shoah totally undermine the church and the UN as vicar from heaven moral authorities.

    The modern “Palestinian national identity” is a result of 20th-century political developments, particularly in response to Zionism and British rule. While not a pre-1948 sovereign state, the Arab population in the region developed a distinct national consciousness. Most international bodies and historians view the current conflict not as a fight over a lost ancient state, but as a clash between two national movements (Zionism and Palestinian nationalism) over the same land.

    The problem with this smelly revisionist history, Arabs lost their repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea. Actions have their consequences. The repeated Arab defeats to duplicate the ways of Hitler, Chamberlain and Pius XII definitively proves that Arafat’s ’64 PLO “Balestinians”, never merited the “mandate from heaven” to rule as an Independent nation – not in past Arab/Muslim Ages nor today. Just as Jews post Bar Kochba lost our national Independence following that disastrous “Nakba” defeat; how much more so Arab refugees who never ruled Muslim Ottoman Greater Syria as an independence nation – post ’48 lost all claims to self determination claims. No different than post WWI & WWII Germany who lost all claims to Prussia as Germanic self determination.

    The attempt repeatedly made by post ’67 UN Resolutions (242, 338, 446, 2334) to make a טיפש פשט limitation to “the conflict as indeed a clash between two nationalist movements” what an utter farce! Iran some 1000 miles distant from Israel. Hezbollah Shiites in Lebanon have no connection what so ever with Arab Sunni refugee populations within the borders of the Jewish State. Post Shoah “NEVER AGAIN”, means that mentally deranged racists shall never again decide for the Jews their racist versions of their “FINAL SOLUTIONS”.

    For nearly 2,000 years of exile (since the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE), this phrase L’shanah haba’ah b’Yerushalayim, spoken by Jews in every corner of the globe, from Spain to Persia to the Americas. It served as a constant reminder that the Jewish people had not abandoned their claim to the land, nor had they assimilated into the lands where they lived as minorities. The fact that this prayer survived the horrors of g’lut and recited every Pesach by millions who had never seen the city, proof that Jews never surrendered our Torah oath brit inheritance, which explicitly excluded both Yishmael and Esav. The 1948 establishment of the State of Israel and the reunification of Jerusalem in 1967, viewed by Jews as the historical fulfillment of this centuries-old Torah brit oath.

    The post war Israeli victory starting in ’48 … after the fact couch potato quarterbacks … they do not determine Israeli identity. Britain returned the mandate after the Irgun blew up British headquarters in the King David Hotel. France lost WWII and thereafter its colonial empire in both Vietnam and Algeria disintegrated. The De Gaulle reversal of the French military alliance, just prior to the expected Nasser obliteration of the Jewish state definitively proved Herzl’s analysis as correct.

    Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords rejects as hog-wash the notion of clash between two national movements with deep historical roots, both claiming legitimacy over the same land. Israeli strategic foreign policy seeks to integrate Israel into the community of nations of the Middle East and North Africa. Arab refugee populations and the failure of Arab and Muslim state to repatriate their refugee populations – an Arab/Muslim problem NOT an Israeli problem. Israel eventually gave ’48 Arabs Israeli citizenship. UN Resolution 194 does not apply across the board to as yet unfought Arab Israeli wars like 1967! That PA criticized the Accords does not amount to squat; that treaty cut with nation states and not minority populations scattered across the Planet Earth.

    Like

    Reply

      3. You cannot define an undefined word by repeating that word over and again. That’s a dog chasing its own tail logical error. You have twice opened with an illogical ad hominem personal attack “I hate”.

        Clearly your upset by what I wrote. But I cannot address your anger without rational discussions.

        Like

      7. I’d really like to hear your take on:

        The resurrection from the dead: The rise of the Jewish state following 2000+ years of exile.

        Hebrews 12:2 the ultimate substitute theology which the Roman forgers and counterfeits attempted to cause Israel to forget the Torah no different than as did the Syrian Greeks, approximately 100 years earlier! Clearly, no Xtian “believer” dressed upon in the costume of a “scholar” has ever weighed this possibility; due to the simple facts that believers hold: Don’t confuse me with the facts! I have my religion!!

        The early church rewrote or reinterpreted Hebrew scripture to replace Torah with a new “substitute” religion, similar to the Seleucid attempt under Antiochus IV – a form of supersessionism — the idea that the Church replaces Israel. They loved assimilated Alexandrian Philo and the Roman Kapo Flavius Josephus. The latter’s book Antiquities 18.63–64:
        “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of people who accepted the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Christ. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate condemned him to the cross, those who had first loved him did not cease. For he appeared to them alive again on the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other marvelous things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.”

        The priest most often accused of having forged or interpolated this paragraph – Eusebius of Caesarea (4th century); after Xtianity became the Roman Empire’s favored religion (4th century). Xtianity as the state religion of Rome censored all manuscripts; scribal alterations in monasteries could spread modified readings. The church lost this power with the 15th Century invension of the Gutenberg printing press. But even contemporary scholarship generally agree the this double D-cup insertion came via Eusebius’ quotations which later monk scribes inserted into the actual texts. In 1971, scholar Shlomo Pines highlighted a 10th-century Arabic version of the text by the historian Agapius, which lacks the overtly dogmatic Christian interpolations, suggesting a neutral original baseline text existed before Roman scribal alteration.

        Xtian “tripe rhetoric\\propaganda” declares – the good noise gospel: “JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets”! Despite never such similar language anywhere across any of the Hebrew T’NaCH sealed masoret Books; which the Church first thing, once the State religion of Rome – discarded and cast upon the dung heaps of History. Order the opening central theme of the בראשית aggadah story of creation.

        The Torah ‘order’ based upon a clear פ – ס \ chapter – subchapter system which the later Books of both Prophets and Holy Writing likewise obey. This Order akin for the sace of a physical comparison to a “Fach/space-gap” — a compound term used in architecture, preservation, and building-technical contexts to describe the intentional or resulting gap between two built elements or between a building element and an adjacent space. What separates a NaCH sugya from another NaCH sugya? A space-gap.

        The treif bible church translations and koran false prophet (((Neither forgery understands the Torah concept learned directly from Moshe Rabbeinu that prophets commandment mussar to all generations. Prophets do NOT foretell the future; herein separates the mystic Book of Daniel from the Books of the Prophets!))), organized around alien and utterly foreign chapter\verse substitute order or poetic stanzas.

        This change of Order compounded with the insertion of word based Names of God like JeZeus or Allah. Both foreign alien counterfeit substitute religion belief in “their” Universal Monotheistic God(s) over Torah common law as faith – תורה לא בשמים היא. Changing the order of texts produces radical consequences God does not mean nor refer to Dog. ברית does not compare to covenant because the former requires שם ומלכות – meaning the oath dedication of Oral Torah middot spirits לשמה which both the church and mosque emphatically deny that such spirits even exist! אהבה does note remotely compare to agape love. משפט צדק defines justice – common law courts ruling fair compensation of damages – does not compare to Paul’s addiction to Jezeus who atones for the eternal guilt trip of Adam’s original sin. A גר צדק does not remotely resemble to a Pauline uncircumcised Philistine; despite the church and the mosque huge as Goliath!

        The radical change of Shaul the talmid of Rabban Gamliel HaNassi to Paul – exceptional. Paul’s writing preandidate the gospel texts themselves. A dog without a nose, even that animal could smell the coming revolts first in Alexandria Egypt and later in Judea! The Hanukkah model of how Yechuda Maccabbee defeated and achieved victory over the Syrian Greek empire clearly both Gamliel and the generals of Rome weighed and considered. Any interpretation of ancient history which ignores this fundamental precedent – not serious scholarship.

        Shaul as a talmid of Gamliel traveled to Damascus and get’s stoned! That red flag together with the “stoning of Stephen”, two primary witnesses that something stinks in Denmark! Both men according to Torah law would require a trial before a city of refuge small sanhedrin court. The Goyim manner of “stoning” a direct Torah violation! The Talmud deliniates 4 separat types of death penalty. Stone people on the street without a Capital Crimes trail, no connection to any of the 4 types of Capital Crimes death sentences.

        That Paul got up and walked to Damascus on his own power strongly indicates the “stoning” a set-up which would permit him to infiltrate the Xtian camp as a fellow converted believer! In Damascus Paul preached “not under the law” “circumcision” not a commandment for Goyim. In Rome Paul preached “worship JeZeus the son of God” when Romans worshipped Caesar as “the son of God”. Both cases suggest that the intention of Paul to inject a form of Monotheism into Roman society to promote Civil War!

        The Roman counterfeit of JeZeus through the gospels promotes a false messiah dogmatism aimed to promote the many and hostile sects already fighting among themselves to further splinter and divide. “Divide and conquer” a gospel famous term of reference.

        The earliest gospel of Mark – written in Rome about 70 CE. This gospel profoundly suspect. Simply because the destruction of Herod’s Temple – NEWS! The killing of a criminal through cruxifiction – common/NOT NEWS. Paul as a deliberate Sanhedrin/Gamliel agent! Based upon Yechuda Makkabbee declaring his loyalty to the “real king of Syria”. Just as Yechuda sought to undermine (shatter the ethical containment force) the government of Antiochus IV, so too Paul, based upon this model sought to do the same within Rome itself.

        This idea that revolution requires shattering the ethical containment force of a civilization, perhaps the “soul of the people” requires two fundamental legs to stand upon. 1) Reject the current government order. 2) Reject the religion of the current government order. Examples: the American Revolution established citizens having rights vs. serfs as slaves. The French revolution rejected both the king and the Catholic church replaced by the church of reason! The Bolshevik revolution, modeled itself after the French revolution. Lenin and Troskii both rejected the 300 year Czarist regime together with the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Nazi revolution too rejected the British French dictated peace together with its imposed democratic government. Likewise the Nazis utterly despised the church and favored the Arian ancient religions. The Iranian revolution too rejected both the Shah and western liberal values.

        Bottom line: Post Shoah NEVER AGAIN. Goyim racism as expressed through both “Jewish Problem” and “Dhimmi”, terminated with the rise and establishment of the Jewish state. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah. Why has Allah suffered defeat after humiliating defeat from the Jews who rule over Arab refugee populations?

        Like

      8. Torah constitutional doctrine of the 2nd commandment

        Prophetic mussar interprets the k’vanna of 13 Oral Torah middot Spirits which Moshe heard at Horev following the calf abomination! To do this requires common law precedents which compare a NaCH sugya with a similar but different NaCH sgya/ot which contain the exact same order of Oral Torah middot. To interpret Oral Torah wisdom spirits – the rhetoric of the NT does not teach these wisdom skills.

        The NT—Paul included—does not present itself as a rabbinic legal interpreter of Mosaic Oral‑Torah middot or as engaging in NaCH sugya methodology; it operates with different “avoda zarah” categories and interpretive aims which promote not only a false messiah but JeZeus is God and dress this theology as prophesy fulfilled. The Pauline religious rhetoric flat out fails to differentiate statute law from common law. Paul and the NT do not use rabbinic sugya methodology or the formal “middot” precedent method; the NT introduces Greco‑Roman rhetorical forms, typology, & citation to foist the lie that any son of man/God can fulfill the words of the prophets – straight up avoda zara.

        A crystal clear example: the concept that a married woman could conceive through “virgin birth” the son of God; Hercules serves as a classic example of this av tuma avoda zarah. Paul’s letters repudiated brit melah but ignore the bi-polar kiddushin/get commandment from the Torah which the catholic virgin birth invalidates.

        The NT ignores the Torah commandment of Yibum where a man who dies without children the brother has a mitzva to marry his brothers’ wife – the story of Yechuda and Tamar. This latter example serves as evidence that just as the Torah commands divorce through get, equally so kiddushin the mitzva of transferring “title” to the baal that he will father the children of that union. In cases of divorce, get required which returns “title” back to the woman such that she can marry through kiddushin another Jew.

        This Torah implied backdrop (דיוק) the gospel narratives of Mary totally perverts. Paul as a student of Rabban Gamliel would most definitely known this fundamental Torah דאורייתא fundamental. His ‘not under the law’ rhetoric likewise conceal fundamental Torah commandments! Just as speaking “tongues” has no T’NaCH precedent so too the Pauline hype “not under the law” fails to differentiate Torah commandment of the status of a bastard son!

        The Pauline letters and later Gospel false messiah stories, establish an entirely new religious substitute theology belief system by which the later church introduced its NT\OT perversion as the opposite of accurate. Goyim simply do not compare to a grafted Kilayim (forbidden mixtures) as Paul suggests. Based upon the T’NaCH example of Ruth the ger tzeddick process rigorous.

        This day night divergence a historical fact. Does the Harry Potter false messiah gospels expose a Roman attempt to promote Jewish civil war among the already violently divided Jewish sects prior to the outbreak of the 66 Jewish revolt? Does Paul in turn function as an agent provocateur tasked by Rabban Gamliel to infiltrate and push-away and undermine the influence of this new heretical sect by preaching circumcision not a Torah commandment for Goyim in Damascus; while preaching to Romans to come worship the Son of God king of the Jews in the city of Rome. Impossible to know. Only that the writings of Paul clearly different from the other NT writers. And in point of fact, Paul’s “method” closely resembles to that of Yechuda Maccabee in his revolt against the Syrian Greeks.

        The famous Israeli spy Eli Cohen, like Paul – publicly executed. Spies by definition rely upon duplicity rather than making bold declarations to the enemy that they seek the destruction of that opposing enemy state. Consequently, there exists no physical evidence that Paul operated upon a secret agenda. Nonetheless the Pauline propaganda as codified in the NT did greatly contribute to the overthrow of the earlier Greek and Roman Gods. As such, this speculation as believable as Zeus giving birth to Hercules as a belief system.

        Whereas T’NaCH serves as common law which operates independent (as humanly possible) of any and all theological belief systems; for example the Talmud never once brings the 1st commandment שם השם. The NT\OT stand upon the Greek rhetoric bedrock of sand/fuzzy logic wherein the mobs believe language as inspired even though they do not understand that “tongue” – such as practiced in all Pentecostal churches; Xtianity and later Islam – both theological belief systems by the core. Whereas the Torah faith of justice rejects “belief” as something akin to accepting a bribe.

        Rome’s Achilles heel, Egypt the primary source of cheap bread. A unified Jewish revolts in Alexadria Egypt and Judea which expelled Roman legions from their home base in Syria – represented a nightmare threat to the known Roman empire.

        What proves the definitive fraud of both church and mosque the “by their fruits you shall know them” slander libel taxation without representation ghetto gulag Inquisition mentality which produced the Nazi Shoah.

        Torah as prophetic common law, trains the chosen Cohen people in the conquered land of Canaan to riteously pursue justice in remembrance of the judicial corruption of ancient Egyptian vertical courts which obeyed Par’o. Both NT/Islamic cult of personality belief-systems replace justice with mythical Gods not know to the Torah NaCH and Writings. Such foreign Universal God rhetoric, exercised through racial KKK – power structures, whose fruits for Am Yisrael utterly catastrophic down through the Ages. So cruel, that any attempt to dress them garments of nevu’a language, the very wolf dress in sheep garments; itself, both NT and Koran define the 2nd Sinai commandment. As such, when will Israel expunge this cancerous avoda zara from within the Jewish state? Starts with the rigid rejection of rhetoric slogans of belief in God – Jewish, Xtian, or Muslim. The righteous pursuit of justice defines the Constitutional Zionist Republic which mandates a Federal lateral common law judicial system which regulates akin to a bureaucratic regulations statute law, starting with belief in a Universal montheistic god in heaven.

        Interpreting the 2nd Sinai commandment “expunging avoda zara” not limited expelling foreign Goyim churches and mosques or even synagogues! Rather expelling the very idea that the State may coerce belief at all. Tzedek, tzedek tirdof the top dog (so to speak) of Zionism/Jewish self-determination.

        Like

      12. ??? your code language employs no basis. This that other different comment … communicates nothing with clarity. Vague language indicates you feel emotional over some issue which offends you personally.

        Like

  21. There has never been a president that has harmed Christianity more than Donald Trump. Indeed, Christians everywhere are mocked, ridiculed and lambasted because so many of them have turned a blind eye to his whoremongering. As a Christian, I can’t fathom how the household of faith has coalesced around the most evil president that I can think of.

    Certainly I understand that social values issues like abortion and LGBT rights conflict with Biblical teaching and Christian values. That being so, I understand why a Christian might vote once for Trump or choose not to vote at all, but to double and triple down by enthusiastically supporting (or unenthusiastically, for that matter) this vulgar, lying, charlatan, con-artist rapist, mocker of decency, race-baiting buffoon is beyond rationale. Donald J. Trump is an anti-Christ. It is obscene and the very definition of derangement for a Christian to support him.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

Leave a comment